“I just want to say one word to you – just one word. Are you listening?
PLASTICS! There’s a great future in plastics. Think about it. Will you think about it?”
Think about it. Just for a minute. What it
is and what it’s come to mean to us. Plastic is perhaps the most
pragmatic invention in human history. Really! It’s so useful that we
can make absolutely anything out of it. Amazing! And it’s so cheap that
we can just throw it away when we’re done with it. Convenient! Or is
it? Think about it…
The thing about plastic is that it never
really goes away. It’s garbage – garbage we use to make garbage – but
it’s indestructible garbage. There is nothing in our natural
environment that can break it down. That means every cheap piece of
plastic we’ve ever made still survives somewhere, in some form,
suffocating our environment(s) – physical, social, and psychological.
Plus, plastic is toxic. Toxic waste, to be exact. It’s the number-one
by-product (read: run-off) of petroleum processing.
Petroleum By-Product thinks about this. They even sing about it. As
their name suggests, they have a particular fascination with exploring
the schizoid nature of plastic, and the paradox(es) it presents to us.
Think about it a bit more: plastic has become an impossibly equally
suitable symbol for both the perpetual and the dispensable. It’s a
permanent substance we use to make almost exclusively expendable things
– things of no lasting substance to us. See the contradiction? It
doesn’t stop there. The paradox crosses over into our psychology as
well, especially when it comes to the plastic nature of contemporary
culture – the disposable, synthetic, and superficial aspects of modern
society. And like millions of bits of discarded plastic, these bits of
throw-away culture gather together and re-combine into larger forms
that come back to pollute our surroundings, and our future. Unless we
find a way to reabsorb them. To re-use and recycle them. Now.
It does make you think tho, doesn’t it? How much of what we create
on a day-to-day basis is truly permanent? How much is merely made to be
thrown away? How much of what we throw away stays away? How much of it
is good for us, and how much is toxic?
Unlike most image-driven commercial pop acts, Petroleum By-Product
understand that their music is potentially permanent and/or disposable
– depending on what we do with it. And although they consider
themselves both commercial and a pop band, in their case it’s the music
drives the image, not the other way around. The ‘By-Prods’ also know
the difference between being original and appealing to their
influences; between creating and re-creating music. They definitely
create original music – but they also re-create sounds from the music
that they like. Especially sounds from the ‘throwaway’ music of past
eras. In that sense they are exactly what they claim to be: by-products
of the plasticity of a throw-away society.
They manage to express this in a positively engaging way, however,
through a blend of dancey garage-y synth pop-ish sounds a la the B-52s
meets Depeche Mode meets D.A.F. – although their influences are varied
and surprising and seem to be different every time you ask. As if it
depends on the moment. From pop, new wave, and no-wave to post-punk,
electronic, and industrial they’re a simultaneously original and retro
-sounding synthesis of synthetic music from previous eras, presented in
the present moment for the sake of the future.

One undeniable element that’s had a major influence on the By-Prods is the particular upbringing of singer/synth player Sally Dige Jørgensen and bass player Vanessa Turner,
the group’s original founding members. Although they didn’t meet until
highschool, both had grown up in homes where all forms of plastic and
other disposable synthetics were strictly forbidden. Now, along with
capitalist (re)percussionist (both analogue and digital) Robin
Borawski, they’re taking this philosophy forward by challenging the
more intangible forms of superficial disposability currently polluting
popular culture, and in particular pop music.
Can you fill me in a bit more on your particular upbringing, ie: no plastic, etc?
S: Through determination to avoid plastic, certain metals and
technologies that we allowed ourselves to be exposed to became very
minimal, which subsequently resulted in a complex lifestyle.
How do you think that has influenced your art and your music?
V: Through our health-extreme upbringings both of us became
fascinated with how manufacturing and naturalization impacts the human
condition.
S: We are interested in reflecting in our music and art that which
is true to our generation: dominating this generation are artificial
tangible forms and superficial, distant and “fake” relationships, i.e.
facebook and online networking. We enjoy most to glamourize the
lifestyle our generation has manifested, and thus have come up with our
own Petroleum By-Product manifesto:
“Denaturalize – Dehumanize – Efficient Lives – Commercialize”
Petroleum By-Product is really a sort of code-word for plastic… are
you referring more to the destruction of our physical environment with
synthetic-based pollution or the permutation of disposable trash in our
society and in our popular culture?
V: It’s more of a reference to how the masses are a ‘by-product’ of a trashy petroleum-based monoculture.
R: I refer the plastic concept to how or society has become. People
would rather use facebook or text messages for a primary source of
communication, rather than using a phone or meeting up in person.
Think fast… your three biggest musical influences:
R: Discharge, (early) Chaos U.K., Joy Division/New Order
V: Soft Cell, Wendy Carlos, Devo
S: Devo, OMD and Soft Cell.
Your three biggest artistic influences:
S: Grace Jones, Devo, Kraftwerk and Andy Warhol. I know, that was four.
V: Herbert Bayer, Phillip Garner, Kenny Scharf
R: Art Deco, classic Dante Inferno type art, and beautiful women
What do you think the most disposable music being made today is?
S: Top 40 music. Same beats, same aesthetic that gets dated very fast.
R: I guess I throw that music away everyday by not listening to it.
V: Most of today’s popular music will be discarded and forgotten.
What’s the most indelible (what’s gonna last)?
R: Nothing will last forever.
S: As cheesy as it sounds, possibly Rock ’n’ Roll. It has morphed
through the decades but still has remained incredibly popular since the
1950’s.
Do you consider your music to be disposable?
S: In a way yes. I should hope all artists see their work to be
something disposable or “temporary,” because I find the most
interesting and creative artists are the ones who can continually
reinvent themselves (or their art).
R: In a sense, all pop music is disposable, and we like to think we have a pop aspect to our music, so I would say yes.
V: Like the cycle of plastic, it is manufactured, distributed,
enjoyed, disposed of, and then recycled into something new but it will
always live on in some shape or form, or sound in our case.
What are your thoughts on the recycling of ideas… can we preserve
ideas by re-using them the same way we conserve the environment by
re-using and recycling?
R: It depends on what kind of idea. In terms of music, I think that
all music is recycled, but nothing is ever fully recycled. The product
is always just downgraded and requires constant new material to keep
the quality up to code.
V: Artists/musicians/inventors have always looked to the past for
inspiration or based their ideas off others and elaborated them.
You do everything yourselves, but don’t really consider yourselves ‘DIY’… why?
S: We find the ‘DIY’ culture to be somewhat of a turn-off.
People tend to use ‘DIY’ as an excuse for a shitty product. Yes we find
ourselves doing most the work ourselves but we still try to aim for an
end-product that looks professional, slick and even commercial.
How has your music changed from what’s on the new album – “Superficial Artificial” – to what you’re playing now?
R: Different line-up and different instruments. The old sound was
comprised of organ, guitar, bass and acoustic drums. Now we have
synthesizer, bass, acoustic and electric drums. Our new sound is more
influenced by industrial sounds, such as the clanking of metal
and stark landscape sounds structured into pop songs.
“Superficial Artificial” will only be released on vinyl and by
download, is that to illustrate the difference between music as a
tangible artifact (ie: a physical record) and music as an intangible
moment (ie: a live performance or digital file)?
R: No. We are releasing this record on Vinyl because we
always wanted to have an album on Vinyl, and seeing how not everyone
has a record player people will still be able to have access to our
music through the digital download.
V: We did vinyl because it has a better sound, there’s a growing
market for it, and there’s more room for art. CD’s are obsolete and
deteriorate faster than vinyl and anyone can do it.
S: We went with what is commercial today. Nowadays, releasing music
on vinyl IS commercial and the digital download makes for a
consumer-friendly and efficient addition.
Did you know that PVC (polyvinyl chloride, what records are made
from) is the most hazardous petroleum by-product we’ve ever come up
with?
R: I didn’t know that, but that is hilarious.
S: Well, they haven’t been discontinued yet like the Polaroid camera film.
When PVC burns, the smoke that emanates causes a chemical reaction
in our lungs that turns the water to hydrochloric acid. Isn’t that
insane?
S: It is.
R: Wow. I guess our album can be used
as a chemical warfare weapon. I guess that is kind of terrible, but
funny at the same time.
V: Yeah! I suppose we won’t say “hot new album,” when advertising it…

Petroleum By-Product “Superficial Artificial” album release party: Friday December 12 at the Astoria, Doors at 10pm